$3.5k p.m, realistic or not?
It's a good and cool weekend R&R after a long week.
When we hear of people able to retire with $1k p.m., we would usually react that it may not be adequate. I agree that we should not judge on how low or high?
Agree that to each his own. In the end, some may just cheer or jeer.
Web-search survey shows $3.5k p.m. is possible to retire with in SG for a household, maybe with no car and staying in hdb or frugal expenditure ?
I am a bit KS. If $3.5k p.m is enough, then:
My quoting of $5k p.m. is to pitch higher than the typical norm that $3.5k p.m. is enough. Generally some better-off say the realistic monthly expenses, for now, is $5k p.m.
I quite agree with this practical and realistic number.
Better to aim high, but expect the worst.
Certainly not $1k p.m. as my cohort had earlier shared and I shared earlier. See my blog.
For his case, he stays in condo, have aged dependency and married.
But for singles without any obligation, $1k p.m. may be enough; sure enough if one retire elsewhere like MY or nearby.
I don't need any numbers; but if the numbers seem not realistic, we just share it and discuss our blind spot.
~~~~
On tagging $5k, inflation-adjusted $10k per monthly as retirement expenses may be disturbing in year-20; it is indeed.
I use DBS Nav Planner. These are real numbers, inflated due to projecting inflation cost.
That's why most are still employed; some worry for self sufficiency; some saving and accumulating for their children.
Comments
Post a Comment